Education is characterized by more than the amount of time spent attending lectures and reading textbooks. My college education has demanded me to push beyond my initial academic and intellectual boundaries. I often found myself thinking, “explore beyond the pages,” in effort to encourage my development into a more rounded individual.
This academic year I have been heavily focused on advancing my communication skills.
As an aspiring child psychologist, acquiring effective communication is essential. The works I have compiled on this e-portfolio reflect my efforts and growth as a writer as I explored beyond what I knew.
My name is Alexis Collins and I am a Psychology BA major and a Biology minor enrolled at Pennsylvania State University.
Welcome and enjoy my e-portfolio!
Alexis' E-portfolio
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Friday, April 20, 2012
Those Three Words.!
I love you.
Three words that are uttered by a mother to her newborn child in her arms. Three words that are shared between two girls who have grown up together since first grade. Three words that are whispered between two teenagers who sit on the bleachers as they reminisce on how they met in the hall. Three words that are told to a wife on her 50th anniversary with her husband.
The phrase transcends any particular type of relationship, age group, or gender.
We all know what the words are intended to express, a deep emotional connection with an individual. But what about the secondary meanings of “I love you?”
I am not sure about you, but I find that “I love you” functions rhetorically as a way to say I will do anything for you (in most cases at least).
For example:
How many times have you heard someone say, “he/she must really love her” following a description of a near outrageous act that an individual did for their loved one? As if to mean the crazier and difficult an action is the more it illustrates ones devotion and love.
I think its funny how I have come to associate ones willingness to do anything for another as a part of love. Especially when in essence that is not what love is.
I guess it plays along with the all too cliche phrase, “love will make you do crazy things.”
Three words that are uttered by a mother to her newborn child in her arms. Three words that are shared between two girls who have grown up together since first grade. Three words that are whispered between two teenagers who sit on the bleachers as they reminisce on how they met in the hall. Three words that are told to a wife on her 50th anniversary with her husband.
The phrase transcends any particular type of relationship, age group, or gender.
We all know what the words are intended to express, a deep emotional connection with an individual. But what about the secondary meanings of “I love you?”
I am not sure about you, but I find that “I love you” functions rhetorically as a way to say I will do anything for you (in most cases at least).
For example:
How many times have you heard someone say, “he/she must really love her” following a description of a near outrageous act that an individual did for their loved one? As if to mean the crazier and difficult an action is the more it illustrates ones devotion and love.
I think its funny how I have come to associate ones willingness to do anything for another as a part of love. Especially when in essence that is not what love is.
I guess it plays along with the all too cliche phrase, “love will make you do crazy things.”
Thursday, April 12, 2012
I Would Run To You.!
So, go ahead and take a couple minutes to watch the video link I have at the bottom of this post.
Hopefully you watched it, now let me talk about what I thought worked and did not work so well for the clip.
The commercial intended to sell the new line of Nike Free Sneakers, but instead overall for me it had the opposite affect. The general story behind the clip was very cute. The message expressed was that Nike’s new product will carry you, the consumer, where you need to get to, even if that is a cross-country sprint to be with your love. I see this as a strategic move by the company to connect with their target audience, young women. And in this society what is one thing that is believed to be a common place among young girls? Love.
I also took notice to the apparent use of color to enhance the product’s affect. Nike uses bright colors not only for the sneaker but for all scenes that involved the young model wearing sneakers. In doing this, the company successfully contrasted their product against all other brands, which are depicted as a fail in comparison of performance.
Though I must admit, I was turned off half way through the clip. Two minutes and thirty seconds is entirely too long for any commercial, especially for a sneaker commercial! Between the clip’s length and the irritating song that is sung throughout the commercial, I became uninterested and distracted quickly before the end came. And in result I did not receive the intended final message.
As advice to Nike Company, I say the theme that was a chosen here was great. But next time keep in mind that the viewer will not remain focused for very long.
Hopefully you watched it, now let me talk about what I thought worked and did not work so well for the clip.
The commercial intended to sell the new line of Nike Free Sneakers, but instead overall for me it had the opposite affect. The general story behind the clip was very cute. The message expressed was that Nike’s new product will carry you, the consumer, where you need to get to, even if that is a cross-country sprint to be with your love. I see this as a strategic move by the company to connect with their target audience, young women. And in this society what is one thing that is believed to be a common place among young girls? Love.
I also took notice to the apparent use of color to enhance the product’s affect. Nike uses bright colors not only for the sneaker but for all scenes that involved the young model wearing sneakers. In doing this, the company successfully contrasted their product against all other brands, which are depicted as a fail in comparison of performance.
Though I must admit, I was turned off half way through the clip. Two minutes and thirty seconds is entirely too long for any commercial, especially for a sneaker commercial! Between the clip’s length and the irritating song that is sung throughout the commercial, I became uninterested and distracted quickly before the end came. And in result I did not receive the intended final message.
As advice to Nike Company, I say the theme that was a chosen here was great. But next time keep in mind that the viewer will not remain focused for very long.
Friday, April 6, 2012
Romantics.!
I am sure you are aware by now of the debut in theaters throughout the nation of the 90‘s tear jerking love story, The Titanic in 3D. Though I can only assume, I believe this film will once again be a hit in box offices after fifteen years since it’s first premiere. Love stories seem to have great popularity in our society and this is nothing new. For countless decades now grandmothers, mothers and daughters around the nation come out to
see these films bringing along their spouses and sons (if they can get them to come). And whether admitted by the males or not, certain love stories which are considered classics, transcend gender and the stereotypes of being “a chick flick.” Just to name a few, there is obviously the Titanic and then there’s the Notebook, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, and, Say Anything. Oh and let’s not forget the all time classic Romeo and Juliet.
So I began to wonder to myself why? Why do these movies gain so much popularity?
In my opinion, I believe it is because of the function they play in our society. Love is a topic or issue (however one views it) that is not only relatable to all audiences, but transcends all. These films serve to play out the way we all envision love, as fairy tales without cartoon characters but real people. Though many criticize these films saying they are unrealistic, think of what small good things they do. In a society where women are many times depicted as objects and are mistreated, these movies give females and males an idea of how they deserve to be treated and what love should look like. And yes maybe the story lines are dramatized, but the underlying messages are positive and true. I would say a little dramatization is better than the objectification that appear in other movies, wouldn’t you say?
filmequals.com
Thursday, March 29, 2012
A Tribute and a Change.!
“Just because someone wears a hoodie does not make them a hoodlum,” Representative Bobby Rush said as he provocatively pulled up his hoodie and put on dark sunglasses. Standing in the middle of the House floor and addressing a room full of government officials, Rush began to recite versus from the Bible as he battled to be heard over the slamming gavel in the background. Although Rep. Rush knew he was out of order and the hood wearing would be frowned upon to say the least, he continued on unshaken.
As you probably assumed this controversial action was in reference to Trayvon Martin, the seventeen year old boy who lost his life just a month earlier. Rush’s objective was to draw attention to the case that has caused much speculation as to if the killing was motivated by racial profiling, while showing support for the grieving family.
Following the incident, Rush commented, "I don't mind being out of order if it means standing up for truth and justice."
Now whether one agrees or disagrees with the measures Rep Bobby Rush took to push the case into the media to be discussed on a federal level, operated just as he intended. He got people talking! Up until now then, the tragedy was generally being discussed on a state level, specifically the details of the Florida State Law that is being used to justify Zimmerman’s actions.
The rhetorical function of this demonstration grows deeper as one understands Rush’s political background as a Black Panther. Knowing that racial profiling is an issue that Representative Rush spent years fighting in the 60s speaks to his ethos and the background knowledge he has relevant to the case.
I must say in my opinion, Rush’s actions are ones I can respect. I mean think about it how many of the individuals who have made a change followed all the rules? Rules sometimes are made to be broken.
As you probably assumed this controversial action was in reference to Trayvon Martin, the seventeen year old boy who lost his life just a month earlier. Rush’s objective was to draw attention to the case that has caused much speculation as to if the killing was motivated by racial profiling, while showing support for the grieving family.
Following the incident, Rush commented, "I don't mind being out of order if it means standing up for truth and justice."
Now whether one agrees or disagrees with the measures Rep Bobby Rush took to push the case into the media to be discussed on a federal level, operated just as he intended. He got people talking! Up until now then, the tragedy was generally being discussed on a state level, specifically the details of the Florida State Law that is being used to justify Zimmerman’s actions.
The rhetorical function of this demonstration grows deeper as one understands Rush’s political background as a Black Panther. Knowing that racial profiling is an issue that Representative Rush spent years fighting in the 60s speaks to his ethos and the background knowledge he has relevant to the case.
I must say in my opinion, Rush’s actions are ones I can respect. I mean think about it how many of the individuals who have made a change followed all the rules? Rules sometimes are made to be broken.
Thursday, March 22, 2012
The rhetoric of I'm Sorry.!
I know speaking for myself I have apologized for things I wasn’t sorry for. Who hasn’t really, in order to help make someone you car about feel better or because you knew it was the “right” thing to do?
From a young age we are groomed to say the words “I’m sorry” when someone else is upset, regardless of our true personal opinions. In fact I believe most instances where I’m sorry is warranted and said, the individual is only truly sorry for getting caught. Am I making any sense here?
Now I can only speak for the 18 years I have been alive, but I am going to assume this issue is not anything new. It seems that the phrase “I am sorry” has developed a different intention from it’s true meaning. In the dictionary the phrase is defined as, feeling regret or compunction. While the true intention of most individuals is to either to say I am sorry you are hurt or I am sorry you found out.
So the next time you are in a situation and you feel the urge to utter the words I’m sorry over and over again to make your case, stop and think is this what I truly mean to say. If not there are hundreds of words in the English language to choose from to better rhetorically express what you mean. Because as I am sure we all can relate, worse than not hearing I’m sorry when you feel it is warranted is hearing I’m sorry and knowing it was not meant.
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Bumper Stickers.!
Whether on a quick run to the store, a drive to a friends house, or a cross country road-trip you are sure to have seen the catchy social-political slogans that individuals place on the backs of their cars. Bumper Stickers! Since the introduction of the first sticker in World War II, there has been a drastic change in appearance, application, and, agenda but the general function has remained the same.
So what do these bumper stickers really do for us, what do they accomplish? Well first they’re simply fun to choose and use to demonstrate ones beliefs and values. Most importantly they evoke thought. Bumper stickers are used in a sense to create exigence and cause change (even with just one person).
Let’s look a few:
Over the past few years a nationwide campaign was started in order to increase awareness of the dangers of drunk driving. The above bumper sticker has this same intention. A clever one right?! The use of the short hand texting language, “LOL. OMG”, works to generate light hearted feelings for the reader. “... RIP,” then severely impacts the reader demonstrating the reality of how quickly an individual can die from an “innocent” text, an LOL. Here a story line is established and that is what makes this bumper sticker so persuasive, for me at least.
.jpg)
Abortion is a hot topic and has been for decades. Of all the bumper stickers I can remember abortion seems to be a very common one. These bumper stickers illustrate the two very polarized sides of the issue: pro-choice and pro-life. The first sticker is simple, few words and no images are used. Why? Because a simple reasoning method is hoped to be implied, leave the choice to the person it’s a private matter. While the other bumper sticker demonstrates a pro-life take on the issue. Using the heart and the heart monitor lines works to appeal to the readers pathos.
Whether comical or serious bumper stickers are little rhetorical pieces of work.
http://www.northernsun.com/Against-Abortion-Bumper-Sticker-(5749).html
http://www.zazzle.ca/lol_omg_rip_dont_text_and_drive_bumper_sticker-128914258003886323
http://www.smileyme.com/listprod.asp?ptype=412
So what do these bumper stickers really do for us, what do they accomplish? Well first they’re simply fun to choose and use to demonstrate ones beliefs and values. Most importantly they evoke thought. Bumper stickers are used in a sense to create exigence and cause change (even with just one person).
Let’s look a few:
.jpg)
Abortion is a hot topic and has been for decades. Of all the bumper stickers I can remember abortion seems to be a very common one. These bumper stickers illustrate the two very polarized sides of the issue: pro-choice and pro-life. The first sticker is simple, few words and no images are used. Why? Because a simple reasoning method is hoped to be implied, leave the choice to the person it’s a private matter. While the other bumper sticker demonstrates a pro-life take on the issue. Using the heart and the heart monitor lines works to appeal to the readers pathos.
Whether comical or serious bumper stickers are little rhetorical pieces of work.
http://www.northernsun.com/Against-Abortion-Bumper-Sticker-(5749).html
http://www.zazzle.ca/lol_omg_rip_dont_text_and_drive_bumper_sticker-128914258003886323
http://www.smileyme.com/listprod.asp?ptype=412
Friday, March 2, 2012
Rhetoric in Cogress.!
Over the past month, in class we have focused on the analysis of advertisements and speeches. Beside the writing aspect, I liked thinking of what made the pieces profound or affective.
Thinking about the assignment we completed Wednesday made me think of a speech I heard of in the beginning of February.
Whether you consistently follow politics or occasionally hear updates through word of mouth, I am sure you are at least aware of a few political hot topics. In the past few years, there has been an increase in the amount of attention given to the topic of gay marriage.
As I was on Facebook a month or so ago, I saw a link to a youtube video titled, Zach Wahls Speaks about Family. Curious, I clicked it.
Turns out the clip was of a young Iowa man, Zach Wahls, speaking to congressmen about marriage equality. Addressing the question associated in the minds of many, “can gays even raise kids,” Wahls built up his ethos to provide a persuasive argument.
Putting ones stance on the issue aside, the brilliant rhetorical functioning of the speech cant not be denied.
Zach introduced himself as a son raised by two women, arguing for their right, & the right for all gay couple, to be legally married in the eye of the law. Of course he affirmed that indeed same sex couples can raise happy and healthy children. But to prove his point he listed all of his accomplishments and then said, “If I was your son Mr. Chairman I believe I’d make you ver proud.”
What made this brief but concise speech so affective was Wahls’ explanation to the audience of what a family was. Zach Wahls explained that there is no difference between a family headed by heterosexuals or homosexuals, closing his speech saying, “ The sexual orientation of my parents has zero affect on the contact of my character.”
(Check it out.!)
Thinking about the assignment we completed Wednesday made me think of a speech I heard of in the beginning of February.
Whether you consistently follow politics or occasionally hear updates through word of mouth, I am sure you are at least aware of a few political hot topics. In the past few years, there has been an increase in the amount of attention given to the topic of gay marriage.
As I was on Facebook a month or so ago, I saw a link to a youtube video titled, Zach Wahls Speaks about Family. Curious, I clicked it.
Turns out the clip was of a young Iowa man, Zach Wahls, speaking to congressmen about marriage equality. Addressing the question associated in the minds of many, “can gays even raise kids,” Wahls built up his ethos to provide a persuasive argument.
Putting ones stance on the issue aside, the brilliant rhetorical functioning of the speech cant not be denied.
Zach introduced himself as a son raised by two women, arguing for their right, & the right for all gay couple, to be legally married in the eye of the law. Of course he affirmed that indeed same sex couples can raise happy and healthy children. But to prove his point he listed all of his accomplishments and then said, “If I was your son Mr. Chairman I believe I’d make you ver proud.”
What made this brief but concise speech so affective was Wahls’ explanation to the audience of what a family was. Zach Wahls explained that there is no difference between a family headed by heterosexuals or homosexuals, closing his speech saying, “ The sexual orientation of my parents has zero affect on the contact of my character.”
(Check it out.!)
Thursday, February 23, 2012
My Promise to Civic Engagement.!
I wanted to shift my topic slightly for this post, you know switch things up. In the beginning of the semester Ben (Professor Henderson) asked the class to free write for two minutes. Do you remember what the topic was? It was civic engagement online. Looking back, I admit I had only the slightest idea what was really being asked of me.
After reading the text book and through class discussions I was able to understand: first what civic life is and secondly how it was related to rhetoric.
Civic life is when one is involved with there community with the intention to make a change. Becoming a rhetor is one of the biggest ways to participate in the civic life within ones community, but I have come to realized it is not the only way.
Seeing as I just turned 18 a month ago, I will be able to vote in the upcoming Presidential elections. Legally turning an adult in this society allows me the opportunity to have my voice heard in an effort to strive for the changes I want to see. I mean after all I am the people and this country is a democracy.
After thinking about how I am looking forward to casting my first vote, my mind drifted to how many individuals in this country do not vote. The lack of civic engagement from us, “the people,” takes away from our democratic government. I mean we all have things to say about the U.S. government, good or bad, and there is always improvements that can be made... but we all need to get involved!
As an African American woman in America, I have now made a promise to myself that I would vote and have my opinion heard. I am a part of a double minority. Someone who has had millions before me fight and even die for me to say I am a citizen and I have the right to vote.
It is not even a question whether I will become civically engaged.
After reading the text book and through class discussions I was able to understand: first what civic life is and secondly how it was related to rhetoric.
Civic life is when one is involved with there community with the intention to make a change. Becoming a rhetor is one of the biggest ways to participate in the civic life within ones community, but I have come to realized it is not the only way.
Seeing as I just turned 18 a month ago, I will be able to vote in the upcoming Presidential elections. Legally turning an adult in this society allows me the opportunity to have my voice heard in an effort to strive for the changes I want to see. I mean after all I am the people and this country is a democracy.
After thinking about how I am looking forward to casting my first vote, my mind drifted to how many individuals in this country do not vote. The lack of civic engagement from us, “the people,” takes away from our democratic government. I mean we all have things to say about the U.S. government, good or bad, and there is always improvements that can be made... but we all need to get involved!
As an African American woman in America, I have now made a promise to myself that I would vote and have my opinion heard. I am a part of a double minority. Someone who has had millions before me fight and even die for me to say I am a citizen and I have the right to vote.
It is not even a question whether I will become civically engaged.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Congo Cancer.!
It’s funny how aware I now am of the rhetoric that surrounds me in my day to day activities.
Today in women studies I watched a clip of feminist activist and playwright, Eve Ensler. She reads her article advocating for the sexually tortured and abused women of Congo.
Take a look...
I am not sure what you think, but the first time I watched that I said to myself, now thats rhetoric. Everything about the article and her delivery was outstanding!
Ensler’s use of her own personal narrative of cancer as a bridge for her audience. The story serves dual purposes, first it allows her readers and viewers the ability to better understand the horrors and troubles of the current situation of Congo, by giving a relatable scenario. Secondly, the issue Eve Ensler is advocating is put into perspective through the description of her narrative. Her most powerful line being, “My cancer is arbitrary Congo’s atrocities are very deliberate.”
It is evident Ensler understood her audience. As a rhetor, she knew speaking of issues from a third world country to individuals thousands of miles away in a first world country would mean she had to make this “hit home.”
The speech would not have been nearly as moving if it were not for her delivery. With out props or aid Eve Ensler was able to convey her passion through her inflection, confident demeanor, and detailed knowledge of the topic in question.
I only hope to be able to deliver a speech with that much power one day.
Today in women studies I watched a clip of feminist activist and playwright, Eve Ensler. She reads her article advocating for the sexually tortured and abused women of Congo.
Take a look...
I am not sure what you think, but the first time I watched that I said to myself, now thats rhetoric. Everything about the article and her delivery was outstanding!
Ensler’s use of her own personal narrative of cancer as a bridge for her audience. The story serves dual purposes, first it allows her readers and viewers the ability to better understand the horrors and troubles of the current situation of Congo, by giving a relatable scenario. Secondly, the issue Eve Ensler is advocating is put into perspective through the description of her narrative. Her most powerful line being, “My cancer is arbitrary Congo’s atrocities are very deliberate.”
It is evident Ensler understood her audience. As a rhetor, she knew speaking of issues from a third world country to individuals thousands of miles away in a first world country would mean she had to make this “hit home.”
The speech would not have been nearly as moving if it were not for her delivery. With out props or aid Eve Ensler was able to convey her passion through her inflection, confident demeanor, and detailed knowledge of the topic in question.
I only hope to be able to deliver a speech with that much power one day.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
A New Image of Rhetors.!
Language has the potential to posses power, that is what this class is
all about. The more I learn, the more I see how rhetoric is weaved
throughout my daily life, on billboards and in conversations.
What I came to realize is the best rhetors are not necessarily the individuals we watch on news channels during election time. The political figures dressed in tailored suits, standing behind podiums spewing eloquently put speeches.
Why don’t we take notice to those who can influence us and make an impact with their advice, which at times can feel like speeches. Is there anyone who comes to mind, a former coach or a parent?
To me, my grandmother is a great rhetor, her ethos reinforced each time
she demonstrates her wisdom and loyalty. Her delivery style is one far
from the pushy techniques of politicians. Instead, she tends to gives
her opinion and advice subtly, allowing me to learn certain lessons that
are critical. She jokes some times that she has a crystal ball; saying
that is how she knew me and my boyfriend would always get back together
when I came crying to her with my issues.
See I am sure not all would agree with me that my grandmother is a rhetor, especially a great one at that. But never will an entire audience agree, right?
What I came to realize is the best rhetors are not necessarily the individuals we watch on news channels during election time. The political figures dressed in tailored suits, standing behind podiums spewing eloquently put speeches.
Why don’t we take notice to those who can influence us and make an impact with their advice, which at times can feel like speeches. Is there anyone who comes to mind, a former coach or a parent?
To me, my grandmother is a great rhetor, her ethos reinforced each time
she demonstrates her wisdom and loyalty. Her delivery style is one far
from the pushy techniques of politicians. Instead, she tends to gives
her opinion and advice subtly, allowing me to learn certain lessons that
are critical. She jokes some times that she has a crystal ball; saying
that is how she knew me and my boyfriend would always get back together
when I came crying to her with my issues. See I am sure not all would agree with me that my grandmother is a rhetor, especially a great one at that. But never will an entire audience agree, right?
Monday, February 6, 2012
Friday, February 3, 2012
Sketchers' use of Rhetoric.!
The hours during the Super Bowl do not just consist of the most watched game of the football season, but also some of the most provocative and reaction- evoking commercials of the year.
Sketchers aired an ad for their line of shape-ups during the 2011 Super Bowl. The individual chosen to do the commercial, Kim Kardashian, was no random choice. In the United States and perhaps around the world, this celebrity is famous for her body and looks. Within the ad she uses the under lying tone of sex and her great shape to sell the product. She stated, “This is isn’t working... it’s not someone else, it’s something else,” referring to the sneakers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3L8Cvx7-9c
I’d say from a company stand point it was a smart decision and excellent display of rhetoric to chose Kim for the commercial. They had a knowledgeable understanding that their audience were typically middle aged women who wanted to get in shape, and what better way to persuade this group than with one of the most desired women in the world?
Sketchers aired an ad for their line of shape-ups during the 2011 Super Bowl. The individual chosen to do the commercial, Kim Kardashian, was no random choice. In the United States and perhaps around the world, this celebrity is famous for her body and looks. Within the ad she uses the under lying tone of sex and her great shape to sell the product. She stated, “This is isn’t working... it’s not someone else, it’s something else,” referring to the sneakers.
I’d say from a company stand point it was a smart decision and excellent display of rhetoric to chose Kim for the commercial. They had a knowledgeable understanding that their audience were typically middle aged women who wanted to get in shape, and what better way to persuade this group than with one of the most desired women in the world?
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Success with Honor.!
Contrary to my last post, I am fortunate to say I have heard a speech that one could consider a rhetoric masterpiece, or close enough to it.
As I am sure most of the campus tuned into, today I watched the two and a half hour memorial in honor of our late football coach and legend, Joseph Paterno. Out of the around ten speakers, there was one I could label as outstanding.
Yes, every individual who stood behind that podium had special memories to share and touching final words to Joe Pa, but Phil Knight separated himself from the others in a big way with his speech.
When Knight took the stage I had no idea who he was and therefore I did not know what to expect, unlike the former football players who I knew would reminisce of old days on the gridiron. Confidence and sincerity radiated from his poised stature, while he began describing how he met Paterno as the founder of Nike. He went on to say the unthinkable. Phil Knight actually acknowledged the elephant in the room! He spoke of the scandal that everyone else tried their hardest to dance around.
This speech was so moving because of the authenticity of Knight’s words. In a dignified way, he was able to implicitly express his opinion of the way Joe Paterno was villainized. He asked, “Who is the real trustee at Penn State University?”
The fact that Phil Knight was an outsider to the Penn State Community made this speech entirely more relatable for the rest of America. A standing ovation was indeed appropriate! I was more than pleased to see rhetoric at its best for a man who was a hero to so many.
As I am sure most of the campus tuned into, today I watched the two and a half hour memorial in honor of our late football coach and legend, Joseph Paterno. Out of the around ten speakers, there was one I could label as outstanding.
Yes, every individual who stood behind that podium had special memories to share and touching final words to Joe Pa, but Phil Knight separated himself from the others in a big way with his speech.
When Knight took the stage I had no idea who he was and therefore I did not know what to expect, unlike the former football players who I knew would reminisce of old days on the gridiron. Confidence and sincerity radiated from his poised stature, while he began describing how he met Paterno as the founder of Nike. He went on to say the unthinkable. Phil Knight actually acknowledged the elephant in the room! He spoke of the scandal that everyone else tried their hardest to dance around.
This speech was so moving because of the authenticity of Knight’s words. In a dignified way, he was able to implicitly express his opinion of the way Joe Paterno was villainized. He asked, “Who is the real trustee at Penn State University?”
 |
| http://oldstateclothing.com/PROD-223714900.html |
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Rhetoric in the Class Room.!
 |
| http://www.utc.edu/Academic/Womens-Studies/ |
I’m relieved to announce I finally get it! Today, sitting in my Women Studies class I began to turn my focus away from the lecture to anything else I could think of that would keep me from falling asleep. I looked down at my chipping nail polish and tried to decide what color I would paint them. I was even desperate enough to even plan out the course work I needed to complete tonight.
Sitting back in my desk I asked myself, how can it be that I am bored?
Well I came to the conclusion that my professor unfortunately never had a lesson in the principle of rhetoric. Her lessons are far from cohesive and easy to follow. Though the subject matter can be dry at times, her lecturing technique is definitely what has most of the students very close to sleeping within 15 minutes of the start of class. Most importantly her presentations lacks charisma. I now understand the importance of connecting with ones audience when presenting a speech. Although the literature discussed concerns matters hundreds of years old, illustrating its relevance to college students of the 21st century would most definitely yield a better captivated audience.
From now on I can better appreciate gathering the skills to become a master at rhetoric.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)